Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 13:28:35 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OPIE breakage: backout & patch for review Message-ID: <20030216212835.GA74550@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200302161911.h1GJBnaX034785@grimreaper.grondar.org> References: <20030216185426.GB52253@dragon.nuxi.com> <200302161911.h1GJBnaX034785@grimreaper.grondar.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 07:11:49PM +0000, Mark Murray wrote: > In the case where an application is OPIEised and not PAMised, we > need to figure out something; PAMizing such apps is not terribly > hard. If any of them are in the base system, then this situation > is a bug in its own right. If they are ports, they need to fall in > with FreeBSD/sysadmin policy. I'll state it again, because many don't seem to listen -- many of us consider OPIEized, but not PAMized 3rd party ports a Good Thing. PAM is nothing but a PITA, OPIE offers useful real functionality. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030216212835.GA74550>