Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:57:12 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, Stefan Farfeleder <stefanf@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r200068 - head/usr.bin Message-ID: <86k4wtn2p3.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20091210173231.GA93327@freebsd.org> (Roman Divacky's message of "Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:32:31 %2B0100") References: <200912031802.nB3I2txS021472@svn.freebsd.org> <20091210163118.GA66146@lizard.fafoe.narf.at> <20091210173231.GA93327@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Roman Divacky <rdivacky@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> Stefan Farfeleder <stefanf@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > For me this breaks the ooo-3 build with:
> >=20
> > unzip: -n, -o and -u are contradictory
> >=20
> > The failing command is 'unzip -quo jurt_src.zip'.
>
> I dont see a reason why this check is there:
>
> if (n_opt + o_opt + u_opt > 1)
> errorx("-n, -o and -u are contradictory");
>
>
> dag, can you comment?
s/dag/des/, please.
The bug is in OOo.
If you look at extract_file(), you'll see that these three options are
handled in three separate branches of a multi-branch if.
-n means "never overwrite"
-o means "always overwrite"
-u means "sometimes overwrite"
so -uo does not make much sense, and -n along with either -u or -o does
not make any sense whatsoever.
> /usr/local/bin/unzip seems to accept those together happilly..
You should check if:
a) -uo gives the same result as -u
b) -uo gives the same result as -o
c) -ou gives the same result as -u
d) -ou gives the same result as -o
e) -uo and -ou give the same result
My guess would be either bc or bde. In either case, there is a risk
that this is not what the user wanted, so IMHO the best solution is to
not do anything at all.
DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86k4wtn2p3.fsf>