Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 12 Aug 1999 12:26:17 -0500
From:      "Jon Passki" <jon.passki@neicoltech.org>
To:        "Freebsd-Questions" <freebsd-questions@freeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   FW: Food for thought on NT security
Message-ID:  <000201bee4e7$c8d91200$6d07a8c0@fbsd.neicoltech.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ho hum, ain't this a perfect flame war starter?

Jon Passki (Happy FBSD user)
NEI College of Technology
office:(612)782-7342
fax:(612)782-7329


-----Original Message-----
From: Windows NT Discussion List [mailto:WINNT-L@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM]
On Behalf Of Joshua Burgner
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 1999 8:20 PM
To: WINNT-L@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Subject: Re: Food for thought on NT security


Just more food for thought:

May I suggest that the shear imbalance between Windows and Unix in
hacking
activity implied in this article are largely due to the following
factors:

1)  Most "sexually frustrated pimple faced virus writers" do not have
access
to Unix systems.  They create and test their nefarious methods not on
elaborate networks, but on simple home systems/LAN's which run on the
most
readily available, widespread operating system available: Windows.
2)  Physiologically, the greater the population density, the greater
the
potential for the spread of disease.  Technologically, the same is
true.
The high population density, the close logical proximity caused by the
great
number of Windows based PC's, also presents greater potential for the
spread
of a virus.
3)  The rich functionality of Windows presents more options to the
potential
hacker than that of UNIX.  While the risk is higher, so are the
benefits.
You cannot have the functionality without the risk.
4)  Windows programming is easy to learn.  Read the help files and all
of a
sudden, you are programming.  This is a great benefit to Windows
programmers
of all types, both those with legitimate solutions, and those with
scurrilous intentions.  UNIX programming, on the other hand...

I am not making the claim that NT is the perfect operating system.
Neither
am I trying to slander UNIX.  I am just stating that the imbalance in
hacking activity between the two operating systems is the logical
result of
the nature of these systems.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Aalberg [mailto:danialaa@CONAGRAMALT.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 1999 4:31 PM
To: WINNT-L@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Subject: Re: Food for thought on NT security


written by a UNIX bigot....  will they ever relent?

This is just my opinion, but I've played with UNIX and it is a stable
and robust OS, but so is NT if on good hardware and installed correct
(just like UNIX).  UNIX has good features (a lot if you are into
Egyptian hieroglyphics at the command line :) for the admin, but to
get
the everyday end user and administrator to work with it at a corporate
level, well, it'll never happen.   The feature rich and intuitive OS
like NT/95 (or, dare I say OS/2) and flexibility of the applications
on
the GUI OS's compared to UNIX is worth ever bit of moron hacker
attempt
and sexually frustrated pimple faced virus writer out there.  And I
tell
ya, If pimple boy put down his playboy and started writing viruses
against UNIX, the "great wall" would fall (published src code makes a
safe OS?)

please no flames, hey, I have a UNIX box at my home.  Up 100%, no
head,
telnet does it all.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Creamer, Mark [SMTP:CreamerM@CINTASMAIL.COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 1999 11:40 AM
> To:   WINNT-L@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
> Subject:      Food for thought on NT security
>
> http://www.oreilly.com/news/hacked_0899.html
>
> Mark Creamer
> LAN Systems Administrator
> Cintas Corporation - "The Uniform People"
> 6800 Cintas Boulevard
> Mason, OH 45040
> (513) 459-1200
> mark.creamer@cintasmail.com
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ----
> The WINNT-L list is hosted on a Windows NT(TM) machine running
L-Soft
> international's LISTSERV(R) software.  For subscription/signoff info
> and archives, see http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/winnt-l.html
.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
The WINNT-L list is hosted on a Windows NT(TM) machine running L-Soft
international's LISTSERV(R) software.  For subscription/signoff info
and archives, see http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/winnt-l.html .

----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
The WINNT-L list is hosted on a Windows NT(TM) machine running L-Soft
international's LISTSERV(R) software.  For subscription/signoff info
and archives, see http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/winnt-l.html .



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000201bee4e7$c8d91200$6d07a8c0>