Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:29:11 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr (Giorgos Keramidas), bostic@sleepycat.com (Keith Bostic), mi@aldan.algebra.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG, msmith@FreeBSD.ORG, wes@softweyr.com Subject: Re: picking a DB (Re: nvi maintainer?) Message-ID: <53966.994782551@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 10 Jul 2001 19:20:23 %2B0300." <200107101620.f6AGKsF01943@vega.vega.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001 19:20:23 +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > At the first glance it is not a big problem - nvi could build its own > private static DB3 library and link against it, leaving DB 1.x for libc. This is the approach that Keith's suggesting, and it makes a lot of sense. The only reasonable argument against it is the size of the vi binary in embedded systems, but that one's taken at least one direct hit on this thread. So then we're done until there's a new release of nvi. Great. :-) Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53966.994782551>