Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 17:10:46 +0200 (MET DST) From: grog@lemis.de (Greg Lehey) To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans) Cc: FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD current users) Subject: Re: make fails Message-ID: <199606241510.RAA03109@allegro.lemis.de> In-Reply-To: <199606241426.AAA27040@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Jun 25, 96 00:26:32 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce Evans writes: > >> Wouldn't it be more appropriate to print out the ld invocation line >> too? > > No more than to add -v to CFLAGS. Well, I'd think that you should either print both the cc -c invocation and the ld invocation, or neither. It's very confusing to just leave some of them out. Personally, I'm for having them both there. > @ is often misused in makefiles, but one running current should be > able to run make -n to see exactly what make would do. Sure. How long does a make -n world run for? Does it really descend properly into all subdirectories? Who expects this behaviour? The current situation is just plain misleading. Greg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606241510.RAA03109>