Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 20:31:16 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org> Cc: Mike Heffner <mheffner@vt.edu>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Importing lukemftpd Message-ID: <20010719203116.A94074@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20010717053406.B6C723E2F@bazooka.unixfreak.org>; from dima@unixfreak.org on Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 10:34:06PM -0700 References: <XFMail.20010716212454.mheffner@novacoxmail.com> <20010717053406.B6C723E2F@bazooka.unixfreak.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 10:34:06PM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote: > > b) we import NetBSD's ftpd AS IS and treat it like vender code with regular > > imports, but break backwards compatibility? > > I think (a) with a twist is the best option; the twist is that we > should try to get as much of our local features into lukeftpd's > distribution as possible. That would be `b' and what should be followed. > This doesn't help the "more work" problem > at all, but solves the "maintainership" problem quite nicely. How? You create more work and that is easly on the maintainer? -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010719203116.A94074>