Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 04:35:02 +0400 From: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: ports-developers@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is fetching source RPMs in linux ports really required? Message-ID: <20090608003502.GF48992@hades.panopticon> In-Reply-To: <20090605.085853.1749234114.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20090605133321.GA18653@hades.panopticon> <20090605.085853.1749234114.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* M. Warner Losh (imp@bsdimp.com) wrote: > I don't think that GPLv2 section 3c applies because we've not received > an section 3b offer to redistribute. Instead, the RPMs are provided > under section 3a. The FSF made a big deal about this not being > sufficient a while ago. Oh, after reading it more thoughtfully I think you're right, sorry for the noise. GPL3, however, still seems to not require this. -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amdmi3@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amdmi3@jabber.ru http://www.amdmi3.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090608003502.GF48992>