Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:31:17 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: svn-src-projects@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r224985 - projects/sbruno-xenplayground Message-ID: <201108191131.17951.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <E159FB28-369C-43CC-9BEB-48D5D35C27E7@lists.zabbadoz.net> References: <201108181815.p7IIFxtV068517@svn.freebsd.org> <201108190751.23647.jhb@freebsd.org> <E159FB28-369C-43CC-9BEB-48D5D35C27E7@lists.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday, August 19, 2011 8:35:23 am Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > On Aug 19, 2011, at 11:51 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Thursday, August 18, 2011 2:50:23 pm Doug Barton wrote: > >> On 08/18/2011 11:28, Ben Kaduk wrote: > >>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Sean Bruno<sbruno@freebsd.org> wrote: > >>>> Author: sbruno > >>>> Date: Thu Aug 18 18:15:59 2011 > >>>> New Revision: 224985 > >>>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/224985 > >>>> > >>>> Log: > >>>> Pay no attention to this directory, in here madness waits. > >>>> > >>>> Added: > >>>> - copied from r224984, head/ > >>>> Directory Properties: > >>>> projects/sbruno-xenplayground/ (props changed) > >>> > >>> Not that it's particularly worth caring, but projects/$user-foo seems > >>> like it might be a better fit in user/$user/foo ... > >> > >> projects/ is for things that are likely'ish to be merged > >> user/ is for things that are related to FreeBSD, but not likely to be > >> merged into src/ > > > > Err, are you sure? The model in p4 that I tend to use is that > > user/$user/foo was for branches I will generally only use myself whereas > > projects/foo was for shared branches where multiple people can collaborate. > > Note that all of gabor's TRE stuff is in a user branch for example and that is > > certainly a merge candidate. I suspect Ben is more correct here. > > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/ROADMAP.txt?annotate=221478 > vs. > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/projects/GUIDELINES.txt?annotate=183722 Humm, well, more reason for me to just stick to p4 (though the main reason is that it actually works). :) That aside, this branch doesn't sound like a definite merge candidate, or at least not something suitable for public consumption from the description. However, I think user vs projects is mostly academic. Both of them add bulk and public, forever history to the repo and making sure to only put stuff in the repo that is actually relevant is more important than the subdirectory it uses. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201108191131.17951.jhb>