Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:56:05 +0000 From: David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org> To: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org>, Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet@gmail.com>, "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r295768 - head/usr.sbin/iostat Message-ID: <156A6796-D62B-4977-893B-E4E727578412@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <83BB8467-4C40-4CF1-B394-1376C9D97FCF@FreeBSD.org> References: <201602182008.u1IK81vg092127@repo.freebsd.org> <CAE-mSO%2B7p=Equq81PPQjfZv1piPydBr4Mnk363CEs3w9EXRi9w@mail.gmail.com> <CAOtMX2hyZ=GFgp8F6t0dMDYF5FSPdoP9KdMU7V5rmscpaPUnsw@mail.gmail.com> <83BB8467-4C40-4CF1-B394-1376C9D97FCF@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 19 Feb 2016, at 23:23, Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>=20
> This warning is only produced when you use -Wall -W, and then =
initialize
> structs partially, i.e. you initialize some fields but not others. I
> think this is a quite reasonable warning for a high warning level.
The warning is annoying in many ways. You ought to be able to zero =
initialise any struct with {0}, but clang objects if you do this and =
requires every field to be filled in. This warning really shouldn=E2=80=99=
t be enabled with -Wall, because it has too hight a false positive rate.
With regard to Bruce=E2=80=99s comment about padding, this is a known =
issue in C11. There is an open DR about it and it=E2=80=99s scheduled =
for discussion at the WG14 meeting in London in April.
David
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?156A6796-D62B-4977-893B-E4E727578412>