Date: Sun, 07 Jul 1996 09:57:00 -0700 From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov> To: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> Cc: grog@lemis.de (Greg Lehey), michaelh@cet.co.jp (Michael Hancock), hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD Hackers) Subject: Re: gcc lies? Message-ID: <199607071657.JAA08248@lestat.nas.nasa.gov>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 07 Jul 1996 01:30:51 -0700 Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> wrote: > Dumb question , is gcc-1.42 a lot faster than gcc-2.x? gcc 1.x compiles things faster. gcc 2.x produces better code. Some people think there's a trade-off to be made there... -- save the ancient forests - http://www.bayarea.net/~thorpej/forest/ -- Jason R. Thorpe thorpej@nas.nasa.gov NASA Ames Research Center Home: 408.866.1912 NAS: M/S 258-6 Work: 415.604.0935 Moffett Field, CA 94035 Pager: 415.428.6939
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199607071657.JAA08248>