Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 20:37:00 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: Mike Heffner <mheffner@vt.edu>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Importing lukemftpd Message-ID: <20010719203700.B94074@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20010719123015.A44746@xor.obsecurity.org>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 12:30:16PM -0700 References: <XFMail.20010716212454.mheffner@novacoxmail.com> <20010717103604.B79329@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010719112221.A84356@dragon.nuxi.com> <20010719123015.A44746@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 12:30:16PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Are you now holding all daemon hostage? I think you're being too strong > > on this statement. If this is going to be the case, please document that > > from now on daemon changes (or new ones) must be pre-approved by the S.O. > > You're being facetious. A little. But I do find that your power play seems to be arbitrarily applied to LukeM ftpd. > I can't give you a commitment, but this is going to be my top priority > to request once we figure out this funding thing. It will get done. What does funding have to do with anything? All the auditing done so far wasn't funded. If you asked your auditing contacts to spend time on this, I think they most likely would. I fail to see why you will not make a commitment. I have committed to GCC 3.0 in 5.0. I know the work that will take, but I have done it anyway. JHB has committed to proc locking for 5.0. There are numerous people that have committed to getting X done for 5.0. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010719203700.B94074>