Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:40:12 -0500 (EST)
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   RE: Peculiar(?) slowdown with -CURRENT as of 21 March
Message-ID:  <XFMail.20020325114012.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020322204145.J88743-100000@mail.chesapeake.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 23-Mar-2002 Jeff Roberson wrote:
>>
>> I saw some similar weirdness in my test machines last night where a dual
>> processor DS20 (Alpha 21264 500x2) beat out a PII Xeon 450x4.  Normally
> the
>> quad xeon beats the DS20.  The quad xeon was using -j16 but was about 74%
>> idle.
>> The DS20 had used -j8.  I didn't get a chacne to run top to see how it was
>> doing during hte world since I didn't notice the weirdness until last
> night
>> after the DS20 had finsihed but the quad xeon was still chugging along.
>>
> 
> Are you both running with WITNESS and INVARIANTS?  UMA is slightly slower
> with these options on than the original malloc & vm_zone code.  I'm not
> sure why it would be even worse for SMP machines though.  So maybe it
> isn't UMA at all but it's worth looking into.

Yes.

-- 

John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20020325114012.jhb>