Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 2 Jul 2013 22:37:35 +0200
From:      Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
Cc:        FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Subject:   Re: [PATCH] nvmecontrol breaks world
Message-ID:  <7513EF4A-7808-4DC5-B60E-3AE93ECF85D1@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAJOYFBCWzzT7kSABROsyJsbt%2BN=KhQ3vmW4TJjw3Toxsxu836A@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20130702201728.GA68544@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <CAJOYFBCWzzT7kSABROsyJsbt%2BN=KhQ3vmW4TJjw3Toxsxu836A@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jul 2, 2013, at 22:30, Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> wrote:
> 2013/7/2 Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>:
>> Could someone (this could even be me, but need approval) please
>> fix nvmecontrol?
>=20
> off_t doesn't need to be intmax_t, right? Maybe add an explicit cast?

Yes, that is what Bruce has suggested for off_t many times in the past. =
:-)


> Also, the call of malloc(sb.st_size) is not really safe...

Sure, but that does not break buildworld (for gcc users, I assume? the =
tinderboxes are all green).

-Dimitry




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7513EF4A-7808-4DC5-B60E-3AE93ECF85D1>