Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 25 Aug 2013 17:24:23 +0200
From:      Erik Cederstrand <erik+lists@cederstrand.dk>
To:        Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Current <current@FreeBSD.org>, David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org>, toolchain@FreeBSD.org, Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>, "Sam Fourman Jr." <sfourman@gmail.com>, Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru>
Subject:   Re: GCC withdraw
Message-ID:  <B22F0FCE-AB91-4BC2-9DBA-342AA0291F67@cederstrand.dk>
In-Reply-To: <1377440469.1111.124.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
References:  <20130822200902.GG94127@funkthat.com> <105E26EE-8471-49D3-AB57-FBE2779CF8D0@FreeBSD.org> <5217413A.9080105@passap.ru> <20130823111647.GT2951@home.opsec.eu> <521745F2.8050607@passap.ru> <CAOFF%2BZ3vbOgMO7T-BKZnhKte6=rFoGcdYcft5kpAgNH2my1JKg@mail.gmail.com> <20130824115158.GA88999@zxy.spb.ru> <EC9008A3-1737-470F-9067-C38FF13CFA20@FreeBSD.org> <20130824154217.GE3796@zxy.spb.ru> <20130824224204.GH3796@zxy.spb.ru> <D6A8F21E-C9AD-48C1-892E-80048343DCBA@freebsd.org> <1377440469.1111.124.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Den 25/08/2013 kl. 16.21 skrev Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org>:

>> Please file clang bugs at http://llvm.org/bugs/
>=20
> And THIS is a major reason why FreeBSD needs a compiler in base =
instead
> of all tools being ports.  The last thing we need is to start =
responding
> to every problem with "this is not my problem, go file a report
> upstream."  If we're already doing it for the compiler that's supposed
> to be the new supported tool, how much worse will peoples' experience =
be
> when we assert no ownership or responsibility for a toolchain at all?

I think it's perfectly reasonable to direct compilation problems in a =
program residing in ports to the developers of the compiler. It really =
has nothing to do with the FreeBSD base compiler. The reason being that =
mplayer relies on a non-docmented GCC-specific asm side-effect, and =
there's a one-line patch in the PR which solves the problem, makes the =
claim even more absurd.

Expecting FreeBSD Clang maintainers to respond to compilation issues in =
FreeBSD base seems perfectly reasonable. Expecting them to respond to =
random issues in the ~24.000 ports is not.

Erik=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B22F0FCE-AB91-4BC2-9DBA-342AA0291F67>