Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 16:51:42 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Matt Jacob <mjacob@freebsd.org> Cc: scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: domain validation Message-ID: <4484B57E.8000600@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <200606051645.k55GjEgP041697@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200606051645.k55GjEgP041697@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matt Jacob wrote: >>From the point of view of how the probe code is currently structured, it > seems that this is the natural place to insert DOMAIN VALIDATION. > > That is, don't make it a function of each HBA, but rather that of CAM > when it is doing device attaching. > > Thoughts? Correct, it needs to be in CAM. The optimal place in the the probe device. Gibbs and I wrote a DV state machine for the linux Adaptec drivers that I've wanted to port back but have never had time to do. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4484B57E.8000600>