Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 15 Jan 2000 22:01:35 -0800 (PST)
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@hub.freebsd.org>
To:        cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/release/texts/alpha RELNOTES.TXT src/release/texts/i386 RELNOTES.TXT
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001152159340.94408-100000@hub.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <200001160555.VAA90950@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Is there any compelling reason to maintain two versions of this file? The
only differences between them seem to be due to bitrot (some i386-specific
things have been added to i386, but a lot of the stuff in the alpha file
is i386-only anyway). IMO we should just have the one file, and denote
machdep stuff appropriately.

Kris

On Sat, 15 Jan 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote:

> kris        2000/01/15 21:55:35 PST
> 
>   Modified files:
>     release/texts/alpha  RELNOTES.TXT 
>     release/texts/i386   RELNOTES.TXT 
>   Log:
>   Remove reference to floppy tape drive.
>   
>   Revision  Changes    Path
>   1.21      +0 -2      src/release/texts/alpha/RELNOTES.TXT
>   1.54      +0 -2      src/release/texts/i386/RELNOTES.TXT
> 
> 
> 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0001152159340.94408-100000>