Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 05 Dec 1999 23:34:13 -0700
From:      Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>
To:        dg@root.com
Cc:        Mohit Aron <aron@cs.rice.edu>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: new Intel 100Mbps card
Message-ID:  <384B58E5.D1B926C9@softweyr.com>
References:  <199912060524.VAA13359@implode.root.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Greenman wrote:
> 
> >
> >Sorry, I forgot to say about the above. Since Wes Peters suggested that it
> >might be a 82558, it put the above name. Please correct it to whatever the
> >name should be.
> 
>    From your other email it sounds like it has an 82559. Intel has been
> shipping that for more than a year as well on boards that ID as 0x1229,
> so apparantly the chip being used doesn't correlate with the ID number.
> In this case I'd recommend changing the above defines to "FXP_DEVICE_ID_1"
> and "FXP_DEVICE_ID_2" respectively. If you are confident that your 0x1230
> Pro/100 is working correctly, including stuff related to manual selection
> of the speed and duplex, then I'll take care of making the changes to
> the driver.

This might be the new 82559ER; I'm downloading the datasheet now.  Have
a peek at:

	http://developer.intel.com/design/network/datashts/index.htm

-- 
            "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"

Wes Peters                                                         Softweyr LLC
wes@softweyr.com                                           http://softweyr.com/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?384B58E5.D1B926C9>