Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 16:31:32 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> To: Chris Knight <chris@aims.com.au> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nsswitch progress Message-ID: <20010529163131.C461@shade.nectar.com> In-Reply-To: <067201c0e881$82f62ad0$020aa8c0@aims.private>; from chris@aims.com.au on Wed, May 30, 2001 at 06:54:10AM %2B1000 References: <20010528183714.C3857@shade.nectar.com> <067201c0e881$82f62ad0$020aa8c0@aims.private>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 06:54:10AM +1000, Chris Knight wrote: > If someone with commit privs is interested, I have a set of patches based on > the 4.1-STABLE patches that apply cleanly to 4.3. This should be slightly > quicker to merge with -STABLE. Are these patches equivalent to the functionality in -CURRENT (i.e. straight port of the NetBSD code: files, NIS, Hesiod only)? Or are they based on what is found on my web page today (i.e. prototype with dynamic linking, reentrant interfaces, nss_ldap support)? If the former, I wouldn't mind if they were committed if the rest of the world wants it. If the latter, that should not be committed to -STABLE under any circumstances, and probably not to -CURRENT either (else I would have done it, instead of putting it off until I could complete the work). Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010529163131.C461>