Date: Wed, 4 Feb 1998 09:25:52 -0500 From: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu> To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Any feedback on my recent kernel 'fixes' Message-ID: <19980204092551.01398@crh.cl.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <199802040034.RAA03201@mt.sri.com>; from Nate Williams on Tue, Feb 03, 1998 at 05:34:42PM -0700 References: <6b8aec$gb5$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu> <199802032356.SAA11555@crh.cl.msu.edu> <199802040034.RAA03201@mt.sri.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On the subject of Re: Any feedback on my recent kernel 'fixes', Nate Williams
stated:
> > >> Is paging more stable?
> >
> > >Unfortunately, I'm away on business, but I back-patched this to my 2.2.5
> > >system which ran a heavy build overnight without any problems, but I
> > >wasn't able to test it much. Hopefully when I get back this weekend I'll
> > >be able to beat it up more.
> >
>
> > And I was just about to do that myself ! Can I get your patches to try
> > out on my server which keeps experiencing swapdeath?
>
> The patch to current applies easily to -stable. (I used CVS to patch
> stable.) Also, I don't have access to that patch as I'm in CA and my
> computer is in my spare bedroom in MT.
I just applied the latest -current patch to my 2.2.5 machine, and have been
beating on it for about 30 minutes here, not a massive test, but its working
nontheless under heavy paging.
-Crh
Charles Henrich Michigan State University henrich@msu.edu
http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980204092551.01398>