Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:50:06 +0100 From: Karl Pielorz <kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk> To: Marko Lerota <mlerota@pdsvelebit.hr>, FreeBSD XEN <freebsd-xen@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Routing/NAT problem on Xenserver 6.2 with virtual firewall Message-ID: <971643C23A6DD25E72F11864@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <86fvfxove9.fsf@arch.perpetuum.hr> References: <86k359p1qm.fsf@arch.perpetuum.hr> <9864A2A7BE97EB706ED0FC04@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <86fvfxove9.fsf@arch.perpetuum.hr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--On 12 September 2014 14:50 +0200 Marko Lerota <mlerota@pdsvelebit.hr> wrote: > Thanks Karl. It may be something that is 'easy' to fix. ICMP traffic > already goes through. So why not just add TCP/UDP in the code :-) > It would be a shame that I have to use Iptables again. Any of the > free DEVs are listening? I'm buying a beer :-). Replying late as I've just walked into this issue, yet again - which prompts me to ask: - Is there any way of having the FreeBSD virtual machine use the Xen disk services, but the legacy 'realtek' network card? I had asked about this a while ago - I think someone said it would be 'very tricky' - and much later someone replied that it might be possible... That would hopefully give us some agility back to these machines - which at the moment are languishing on a separate pool - running pure HVM, which is a real pain for backend storage changes / upgrades :( Maybe it's time for beer++? :) -Karl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?971643C23A6DD25E72F11864>