Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 03:32:57 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: brett@lariat.org (Brett Glass) Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: reviewers for a free software license Message-ID: <199902230332.UAA15907@usr08.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990222200825.03ffb500@mail.lariat.org> from "Brett Glass" at Feb 22, 99 08:19:21 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> If the GPL is shown to be illegal (which I hope it will be), then such > a clause would be invalidated in the new license, too. It would then > revert to being the standard BSD license, which is (I believe) what > would ideally be used in the first place. The standard UCB license does not contain a severability clause, so a failure of one term fails back to "no license to use". GPL does the same thing. Also, neither license specifically acknowledges DFARS. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199902230332.UAA15907>