Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 12:29:56 +0100 From: Mark Santcroos <marks@ripe.net> To: Ceri <setantae@submonkey.net> Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Pierre-Luc_Lesp=E9rance?= <oksala@videotron.ca>, Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kernel panic: vm_object_reference Message-ID: <20020327122956.A434@laptop.6bone.nl> In-Reply-To: <20020327082850.GA3512@submonkey.net>; from setantae@submonkey.net on Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 08:28:50AM %2B0000 References: <E16pmFN-0006U5-00@storage.ukr.net> <20020326075045.B80675@blackhelicopters.org> <3CA14C4B.2F868703@videotron.ca> <20020327082850.GA3512@submonkey.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 08:28:50AM +0000, Ceri wrote: > > > Forcibly unmounting a file system that is in use will panic your > > > system. It's not exactly a bug, it's just how it works. :) > > > > > I don't agree. I know this is a little "foolproof" programming > > but I should return something like busy FS > > How would that be different from not forcing it ? That (or something similar) should be returned to the process accessing the unmounted fs, not the umount itself. Mark -- Mark Santcroos RIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.ripe.net/home/mark/ New Projects Group/TTM To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020327122956.A434>