Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:17:41 +0800
From:      Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com>
To:        Bernhard Schmidt <bschmidt@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Hm, hostap+sta channel information isn't always correctly propagated
Message-ID:  <CAJ-VmonSZMF1BfaNTsavD5Qyw=%2BY-VxqQ-v5vHvjsT1sQeDTPQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAgh0_aqoC4Wau2Pp88NJaZQTuZHUA_ru9mvVgQdNyLuogq1kQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAJ-Vmo=F9ADWL8c-PBeBcs2AykiJcomzWPupV-Sea-Dv1HT8HA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAgh0_aqoC4Wau2Pp88NJaZQTuZHUA_ru9mvVgQdNyLuogq1kQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 30 September 2011 18:57, Bernhard Schmidt <bschmidt@freebsd.org> wrote:

> Do you know if CAC has been stopped/deferred as soon as you 'up'ed the
> STA interface? Doing a scan and CAC at the same is certainly not
> possible on a single physical interface.

I'm not sure. Good point, I/you should create a PR for
freebsd-wireless so we don't forget to check that.


Adrian



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmonSZMF1BfaNTsavD5Qyw=%2BY-VxqQ-v5vHvjsT1sQeDTPQ>