Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 08:20:13 -0500 (EST) From: "Ron G. Minnich" <rminnich@Sarnoff.COM> To: RHS Linux User <dicen@hooked.net> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: What to do about the 2.0 GNU libc? Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970127081833.19633A-100000@terra> In-Reply-To: <32EBC435.63297F3E@hooked.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I just wanted to mention that: rfork as it now exists on openbsd/freebsd does as much as clone does on my latest linux 2.x. Actually judging by the comments in my kernel source it is possible that rfork on freebsd is somewhat more useful than clone on linux. ron Ron Minnich |"Failure is not an option" -- Gene Kranz rminnich@sarnoff.com | -- except, of course, on Microsoft products (609)-734-3120 | ftp://ftp.sarnoff.com/pub/mnfs/www/docs/cluster.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SUN.3.91.970127081833.19633A-100000>