Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 08:15:17 -0400 From: Coleman Kane <cokane@FreeBSD.org> To: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>, Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern uipc_usrreq.c Message-ID: <1215519317.2033.25.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200807081211.32659.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> References: <200807032326.m63NQCdW044654@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080707195209.GD95574@elvis.mu.org> <1215462821.2033.17.camel@localhost> <200807081211.32659.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-RXHhzjqUzxH1LSafRl0K Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 12:11 +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Coleman Kane wrote: > > Hopefully people will begin to incorporate "svn blame" into their > > work-flows. >=20 > A 2 line comment would be much simpler and more likely to actually work=20 > IMO :) >=20 Yeah, commenting such things when non-obvious is always a good idea too, not trying to discount that one bit. Just wanted to suggest that more people try using svn blame/annotate, and this is a good example of why it exists. --=20 Coleman Kane --=-RXHhzjqUzxH1LSafRl0K Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkhzWlIACgkQcMSxQcXat5cKFACfe3l8E1VvMDJIamzaeqHF+JrJ VcUAn1XnLIRmiPdfapv2FSz08L1b7T4W =k/Kd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-RXHhzjqUzxH1LSafRl0K--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1215519317.2033.25.camel>