Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1998 11:14:13 +1000 From: Sue Blake <sue@welearn.com.au> To: Brett Taylor <brett@peloton.physics.montana.edu> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: thoteditor-2.1b Message-ID: <19981006111413.54726@welearn.com.au> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9810051641300.7123-100000@peloton.physics.montana.edu>; from Brett Taylor on Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 04:42:44PM -0600 References: <19981004205251.09260@welearn.com.au> <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9810051641300.7123-100000@peloton.physics.montana.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 04:42:44PM -0600, Brett Taylor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Does thoteditor actually do anything, or have I missed the plot?
>
> It does. I've installed the linux version and run it under emulation (a
> LONG time ago).
>
> The port has been essentially broken for a long time.
>
> > The port seems to have no current maintainer, and has been untouched
> > for just over a year. Is it dead?
>
> I think it's dead. RIP!
> :-)
Hmmm, it's been catching people unawares in the ports collection for
every release since 2.2.5. Looking through the editors, this is one of
the more attractive looking ones that people might try first. Check the
-questions archives for the results.
Of course I'd like to see it fixed but that's beyond my skills.
Do broken ports become immortal after 12 months or do we have a
euthenasia policy? :-)
--
Regards,
-*Sue*-
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981006111413.54726>