Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 15:15:34 -0600 (MDT) From: Justin Ashworth <ashworth@fubar.cs.montana.edu> To: Ken Marsh <durang@u.washington.edu> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: colorls Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.91.960812150113.31533I-100000@fubar.cs.montana.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.95.960812135936.218B-100000@ken.u.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 12 Aug 1996, Ken Marsh wrote: > > I'm doubting that an alias would help for two reasons: > > 1) I don't have lunuxls. > 2) I don't have colorls. Then get one of them. They are both in the ports distribution under the misc category. You MUST use a colored ls and color_xterm if you want to see colorful 'ls' output in X. I happen to like Linuxls because setting it up is more straightforward. Colorls is more customizable. The reason I created the alias is so that I don't have to type 'linuxls --color -F' every time I want to get a color directory listing. - Justin J. Ashworth -- CS Student - Montana State University --- Chair, Association for Computing Machinery - MSU -- ashworth@cs.montana.edu - http://www.cs.montana.edu/~ashworth
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.3.91.960812150113.31533I-100000>