Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 02:28:56 -0700 From: "Kian Mohageri" <kian.mohageri@gmail.com> To: "Aristeu Gil Alves Jr" <aristeu.jr@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: reply-to versus default route - PF/synproxy Message-ID: <fee88ee40610240228vb5bbf97i229accf68107ff7f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2c84c1de0610231318m170dfe55wbc4f3af4fc929b22@mail.gmail.com> References: <2c84c1de0610231318m170dfe55wbc4f3af4fc929b22@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/23/06, Aristeu Gil Alves Jr <aristeu.jr@gmail.com> wrote: > > > route1="( ed0 gw-isp1 )" > route2="( ed1 gw-isp2 )" > > rdr on $if_isp1 proto tcp to port 25 -> 192.168.0.2 port 25 > rdr on $if_isp2 proto tcp to port 25 -> 192.168.0.2 port 25 > > block in log all > > pass in quick on $if_isp1 reply-to $rota1 proto tcp to 192.168.0.2 > port 25 synproxy state > pass in quick on $if_isp2 reply-to $rota2 proto tcp to 192.168.0.2 > port 25 synproxy state > > What are the $rota1 and $rota2 macroes set to? -Kian -- Kian Mohageri
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fee88ee40610240228vb5bbf97i229accf68107ff7f>