Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 Feb 2003 07:19:01 +0100
From:      phk@phk.freebsd.dk
To:        "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Fw: Proposed new sysctl MIB nodes 
Message-ID:  <12094.1046153941@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 24 Feb 2003 17:47:42 MST." <20030224.174742.21056478.imp@bsdimp.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20030224.174742.21056478.imp@bsdimp.com>, "M. Warner Losh" writes:

>The GCC folks have recently started using the HW_PHYSMEM and HW_USERMEM
>sysctl MIB nodes to tune the behavior of the garbage collecting memory
>allocator in GCC.  It was pointed out there that these totally fall over
>with >=4G of RAM, since it's a 32-bit quantity that returns the number
>of bytes.
>
>I'd like to propose new HW_PHYSPAGES and HW_USERPAGES MIB nodes that
>return the same information, but in a 32-bit page count, instead.  The
>implementation is left as an exercise to the reader.  I just want to get
>consensus on the names, so that I can tell the GCC people about it, and
>have it work on all the BSD platforms (as their current sysctl code does).

Makes sense I think.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?12094.1046153941>