Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:59:09 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> Subject: Re: still trouble with pci.c on i386 Message-ID: <86vdfr0yky.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <d873d5be0912280937j20453254l38d54549af0784e3@mail.gmail.com> (b. f.'s message of "Mon, 28 Dec 2009 12:37:52 -0500") References: <d873d5be0912201722v6269800bx989510d47ace1888@mail.gmail.com> <20091222174248.GA61700@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <86ws072she.fsf@ds4.des.no> <200912281058.40733.jhb@freebsd.org> <86zl53105u.fsf@ds4.des.no> <d873d5be0912280937j20453254l38d54549af0784e3@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com> writes: > I think John is referring to my first reply to Anton, early in the > thread, in which I said that I thought it would be easier for Anton to > get help for problems with -CURRENT by using svn revision numbers, > because most base system developers were using that VCS. Apparently, > John at least is not using svn exclusively, and is willing to look up > cvs revision numbers. The problem is that CVS revision numbers are per-file, while Subversion revision numbers are per-commit. A single Subversion commit that affects twenty files will translate to twenty (file, revno) tuples that must be rolled back individually, unless you can figure out a date (or date range) that corresponds exactly to that commit and that commit only. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86vdfr0yky.fsf>