Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 13:19:54 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193055] [stage] dns/posadis: add stage support and claim maintainership Message-ID: <bug-193055-13-DBItXlFWis@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-193055-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-193055-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193055 C Hutchinson <portmaster@bsdforge.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |portmaster@bsdforge.com --- Comment #2 from C Hutchinson <portmaster@bsdforge.com> --- (In reply to John Marino from comment #1) > pre-emptive PR? :) Not exactly. But I guess you could say that too. :) > > > We need the [well tested] diff to do something with it. > > Here's the plan. > > 1) I close the PR > 2) you finish the diff > 3) you test the diff with "poudriere testport" > 4) you attach the diff and testlogs back to this very PR > 5) you reopen it. > 6) then I'll evaluate Well. the "grim reaper" indicates that anything w/o STAGING, gets the axe, on the 31st. Unless there's a pr(1). While I realize this port is rather old. It appeared to still have some value left in it. Runs wonderfully on anything with a proper compiler (GCC). But hasn't been "clangified". The adjustments I've already made. Get it past the STAGE requirement. So the DEPRECATED bit can now be removed. Technically a new pr(1) should be opened after that, against the MAINTAINER. Letting them know it doesn't build with clang. No? I'll attach the current [and working] svn diff, I've already created that STAGEs this for all versions. --Chris -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-193055-13-DBItXlFWis>