Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:20:39 +0000 (UTC)
From:      VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu@FreeBSD.org>
To:        src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   svn commit: r190323 - head/sys/netipsec
Message-ID:  <200903231620.n2NGKdfg014396@svn.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Author: vanhu
Date: Mon Mar 23 16:20:39 2009
New Revision: 190323
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/190323

Log:
  Fixed comments so it stays in 80 chars by line
  with hard tabs of 8 chars....
  
  Approved by:	gnn(mentor)

Modified:
  head/sys/netipsec/key.c

Modified: head/sys/netipsec/key.c
==============================================================================
--- head/sys/netipsec/key.c	Mon Mar 23 14:54:01 2009	(r190322)
+++ head/sys/netipsec/key.c	Mon Mar 23 16:20:39 2009	(r190323)
@@ -4162,11 +4162,15 @@ key_flush_sad(time_t now)
 			    now - sav->created > sav->lft_s->addtime) {
 				key_sa_chgstate(sav, SADB_SASTATE_DYING);
 				/* 
-				 * Actually, only send expire message if SA has been used, as it
-				 * was done before, but should we always send such message, and let IKE
-				 * daemon decide if it should be renegotiated or not ?
-				 * XXX expire message will actually NOT be sent if SA is only used
-				 * after soft lifetime has been reached, see below (DYING state)
+				 * Actually, only send expire message if
+				 * SA has been used, as it was done before,
+				 * but should we always send such message,
+				 * and let IKE daemon decide if it should be
+				 * renegotiated or not ?
+				 * XXX expire message will actually NOT be
+				 * sent if SA is only used after soft
+				 * lifetime has been reached, see below
+				 * (DYING state)
 				 */
 				if (sav->lft_c->usetime != 0)
 					key_expire(sav);



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200903231620.n2NGKdfg014396>