Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 14:13:13 +0200 From: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> To: Lars Engels <lars.engels@0x20.net> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, jt@0xabadba.be, vasanth raonaik <vasanth.raonaik@gmail.com> Subject: Re: concurrent sysctl implementation Message-ID: <20090509121313.GA58540@hoeg.nl> In-Reply-To: <20090509113459.GD56667@e.0x20.net> References: <a0806f900905050107u4cbf0624oc83aafa54ae651f0@mail.gmail.com> <d9f479c10905050239u5d6d8304y1f63e41eabee8624@mail.gmail.com> <20090508214117.GY58540@hoeg.nl> <20090509113459.GD56667@e.0x20.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--c9D8mOo1KWOdrF7C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Lars, * Lars Engels <lars.engels@0x20.net> wrote: > Why is sysctl used to get a random number? Can't we get a different > source for it? We probably could. I think I discussed this with Robert Watson some time ago and we could use things like ELF hints. But still, that doesn't prevent us from reaching this limitation later on. I think other people (Rink Springer) also reported this issue years ago, even before we had the stack protector enabled. --=20 Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> WWW: http://80386.nl/ --c9D8mOo1KWOdrF7C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkoFc1kACgkQ52SDGA2eCwWG6wCeLTizCGSrJjio+5gmA36IEvhw LSIAn1KhfYdQDqqNnaiX04vCYA3Sl3pa =yid8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --c9D8mOo1KWOdrF7C--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090509121313.GA58540>