Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:29:55 +0200 From: Alexander <shulik_freebsd@matrixhome.net> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD as Server Message-ID: <43C8A873.8000900@matrixhome.net> In-Reply-To: <20060113163525.nkluhr8fwg8k0oc0@netchild.homeip.net> References: <375DD163B075E34EA3C10A6286E34A54C1D4B5@exhsto1.se.dataphone.com> <43C7A18D.8060904@centtech.com> <43C7B008.8060404@matrixhome.net> <20060113163525.nkluhr8fwg8k0oc0@netchild.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Leidinger пишет: > Alexander <shulik_freebsd@matrixhome.net> wrote: > >> http://linuxgazette.net/122/TWDT.html#piszcz - there is comparation >> of Linux FS. > > > Since this doesn't cover the FreeBSD implementations of UFS or UFS2, this > doesn't say anything about the reasons why you want to use a different > FS on > FreeBSD. So. Ext2/Ext3 is only modification of UFS and UFS is modification of S5FS. That's why I don't think, that UFS or UFS2 work better than ext2/ext3. But XFS and Reiser has big advantage.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43C8A873.8000900>