Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Jul 1999 00:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Vincent Poy <vince@venus.GAIANET.NET>
To:        Tim Walker <tim@cyberghost.org>
Cc:        Jeff Ito <jeffi@rcn.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: de0 duplex...
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.9907190049020.331-100000@venus.GAIANET.NET>
In-Reply-To: <3791CD1A.C88129F0@cyberghost.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 18 Jul 1999, Tim Walker wrote:

Tim,

> Jeff,
> 
>     This may or may not be the problem, but some (3 Com comes to mind)
> switches don't always recognize full duplex cards correctly. If you put a hub
> between the Nic and the Switch you may be able to trick the Switch into
> running correctly at full duplex.

	Hmmm, if there is a hub between the NIC and switch, isn't the link
going to be half duplex since the hub will make it send to more than one
device.  I thought for Full Duplex to work, it has to be a dedicated
device and the data isn't shared.


Cheers,
Vince - vince@MCESTATE.COM - vince@GAIANET.NET           ________   __ ____ 
Unix Networking Operations - FreeBSD-Real Unix for Free / / / / |  / |[__  ]
GaiaNet Corporation - M & C Estate                     / / / /  | /  | __] ]  
Beverly Hills, California USA 90210                   / / / / / |/ / | __] ]
HongKong Stars/Gravis UltraSound Mailing Lists Admin /_/_/_/_/|___/|_|[____]



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9907190049020.331-100000>