Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 12:47:27 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 64 bit times revisited.. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0110291247030.26174-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20011030065641.B13960-100000@delplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
and you really want us to believe that data file came form 1910? On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > be used for multiplying the seconds scale by 4. (in UFS timestamps.. > > you would never write a non-normalised time to disk) > > also timestamps can't be before 1970 so making it unsigned > > allows us to go to 2100+ and mutiplying it by for takes us to about 2600.. > > Script started on Tue Oct 30 06:55:55 2001 > ttyp1:bde@gamplex:/tmp> touch -t 191001011230 foo > ttyp1:bde@gamplex:/tmp> ls -l foo > -rw-r--r-- 1 bde wheel 0 Jan 1 1910 foo > ttyp1:bde@gamplex:/tmp> exit > > Script done on Tue Oct 30 06:56:10 2001 > > Bruce > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0110291247030.26174-100000>