Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 15:14:55 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: David Chisnall <David.Chisnall@cl.cam.ac.uk> Cc: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: duration of buildworld Message-ID: <20150727121455.GW44094@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <4948BBDE-BE3D-4465-9BCA-BCFDB44989FA@cl.cam.ac.uk> References: <20150727055804.GA2312@c720-r276659> <20150727120006.GJ43740@zxy.spb.ru> <4948BBDE-BE3D-4465-9BCA-BCFDB44989FA@cl.cam.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 01:06:15PM +0100, David Chisnall wrote: > On 27 Jul 2015, at 13:00, Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> wrote: > > > > May be swap trashing on clang compilation? > > 4GB ought to be enough for building clang with -j2. A few of the > template-heavy files can use 500+MB of RAM compiling and linking > with BFD ld can easily hit 1GB (a lot more for a debug build - don't > try this on a 32-bit system!). I am try building 9.x with lot of memory and see about 1GB consumption when comiling (not linking) four clang library. I am don't know how clang in head consumption memory with self-compilation. And we don't know about available memory at this system (may be firefox runing?)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150727121455.GW44094>