Date: Sun, 14 Jan 1996 13:00:15 +0100 (MET) From: grog@lemis.de (Greg Lehey) To: dennis@etinc.com (dennis) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD Hackers), isdn@muc.ditec.de (FreeBSD ISDN Distribution List) Subject: Re: Status of ISDN drivers Message-ID: <199601141200.NAA16875@allegro.lemis.de> In-Reply-To: <199601121546.KAA01414@etinc.com> from "dennis" at Jan 12, 96 10:46:28 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
dennis writes: > >> >> jkh@time.cdrom.com writes: >> WRT getting 128kb/sec. I though the RBOCs in the States only support >> 56kb/sec. per channel ? How you going to squeeze 128kb/sec. out of that ? >> The D-Channel is not used for data transfer (that would be an additional >> 16kb/sec.). > > Of course for $695 you can get RISC-powered "plug and power-up" 128k > sync...but we've been through that one before! This isn't the challenge. I'm currently connected to the Internet via a 286 with 1 MB of memory and a Creatix S0 board running DOG, PC-ROUTE and ISPA. It works reasonably well, performs channel bonding, and costs a whole lot less than other alternatives. The problem is that it isn't as flexible as a *good* UNIX solution. Greg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601141200.NAA16875>