Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:38:13 +0200 (MET DST) From: Nick Hibma <nick.hibma@jrc.it> To: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_lock.c Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95q.990628103756.4320U-100000@elect8> In-Reply-To: <199906280755.AAA97764@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Does this solve the panic discussed in current? Nick On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Kirk McKusick wrote: > mckusick 1999/06/28 00:55:01 PDT > > Modified files: > sys/kern kern_lock.c > Log: > When requesting an exclusive lock with LK_NOWAIT, do not panic > if LK_RECURSIVE is not set, as we will simply return that the > lock is busy and not actually deadlock. This allows processes > to use polling locks against buffers that they may already > hold exclusively locked. > > Revision Changes Path > 1.27 +7 -5 src/sys/kern/kern_lock.c > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.3.95q.990628103756.4320U-100000>