Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 17 Oct 1997 09:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Dan Busarow <dan@dpcsys.com>
To:        Bradley Dunn <bradley@dunn.org>
Cc:        freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: in search of the ideal IMAP server
Message-ID:  <Pine.UW2.3.95.971017085217.27399A-100000@cedb>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971016233644.9615A-100000@ns2.harborcom.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 16 Oct 1997, Bradley Dunn wrote:
> Yes I have looked at imap.org. AFAIK, UW-IMAP does not store messages in
> native MIME format, does it?

Huh?  MIME format is simply a few extra headers and optional
boundary markers (over-simplification but essentially true).
Of course uw-imap stores MIME messages in MIME format.  They 
wouldn't be readable by a MIME capable MUA if it didn't.

> messages in each folder. I have heard that native MIME message stores
> really help in accomplishing this.

Someone you have been talking to doesn't understand MIME.  MIME
addresses a lot of issues but storage efficiency isn't one of them
unless you are refering to message/external-body.  But that's a
function of the sender's MUA, not the MTA or delivery agents like
POP and IMAP.

There's a list of RFC's for MIME at

	http://www.imc.org/rfcs.html#mime

Dan
-- 
 Dan Busarow                                                  714 443 4172
 DPC Systems / Beach.Net                                    dan@dpcsys.com
 Dana Point, California  83 09 EF 59 E0 11 89 B4   8D 09 DB FD E1 DD 0C 82




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.UW2.3.95.971017085217.27399A-100000>