Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 25 Jul 2012 09:14:01 -0700
From:      Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com>
To:        Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: openssl upgrade, libcrypto, libssl confusion
Message-ID:  <CAGH67wRvRpKPZ3mLJ31BHqBCAgbmw3NWh6Y4WfgFhx11KU0ViA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120725120624.GA32934@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
References:  <20120725113029.GA11089@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20120725120624.GA32934@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:30:29PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>> In /usr/src/UPDATING I see
>>
>> 20120712:
>>         The OpenSSL has been upgraded to 1.0.1c.  Any binaries requiring
>>         libcrypto.so.6 or libssl.so.6 must be recompiled.  Also, there are
>>         configuration changes.  Make sure to merge /etc/ssl/openssl.cnf.
>
> oops.. wait a minute, I'm still on
>
> # uname -a
> FreeBSD mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #6 r237134: Mon Jun 18 09:02:17 BST 2012     root@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TZAV  ia64
> #
>
> So this change shouldn't apply to me yet.
>
> Still there are *lots* of binaries, and libs
> linked with /lib/libcrypto.so.6:
>
> Binaries that are linked with: /lib/libcrypto.so.6

...

> and so on,
>
> so is it really right that I can safely delete it?

    Some ldd/objdump and grep magic will give you the answer you need.
check-old-libs only points out candidates for removal based on
existence.
Cheers,
-Garrett



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGH67wRvRpKPZ3mLJ31BHqBCAgbmw3NWh6Y4WfgFhx11KU0ViA>