Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 22:38:43 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 205939] www/lighttpd-mod_*: Mark Un'BROKEN Message-ID: <bug-205939-13-IFg3CQ7bbS@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-205939-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-205939-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D205939 --- Comment #5 from Chris Hutchinson <portmaster@bsdforge.com> --- (In reply to Piotr Kubaj from comment #4) > (In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #3) > I've created repos on: > https://github.com/pkubaj/lighttpd-mod_h264_streaming > https://github.com/pkubaj/lighttpd-mod_geoip >=20 > It may seem clumsy, but I don't know git at all :) There's no history, > current official websites of these mods are: > http://h264.code-shop.com/trac/wiki/Mod-H264-Streaming-Lighttpd-Version2 > http://redmine.lighttpd.net/projects/1/wiki/Docs_ModGeoip > As you can see, there's no revision control at all. >=20 > Now some question: those ports don't have distfile. They're built on top = of > current version of Lighttpd with the actual distfile in patch, specified = as: > PATCH_SITES+=3D LOCAL/mm > PATCHFILES+=3D lighttpd-1.4.26_mod_geoip.patch.gz >=20 >=20 > Since I can't use GH_* macros in patches, would it be acceptable if I set= it > as: > PATCH_SITES+=3D https://github.com/pkubaj/lighttpd-mod_geoip/archive > PATCHFILES+=3D 2.2.10.tar.gz > And then, can I use tar.gz with patches, or at least zip? >=20 > Otherwise, the ports in question would have to be rewritten. >=20 > That's why I'd prefer to host them on my own server :) They needn't be packed at all. They can be simply downloaded, and applied, as plain ASCII text. :) HTH --Chris --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-205939-13-IFg3CQ7bbS>