Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:10:04 GMT
From:      Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Antwort: Re: ports/137865: [patch] sysutils/heartbeat: correct dealing with cases, where are two or more (virtual) interfaces with an IP-address, but only one is up
Message-ID:  <200908190910.n7J9A4Kr099504@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/137865; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>
To: ports@encarnate.com
Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, michael.leun01@vodafone.com
Subject: Re: Antwort: Re: ports/137865: [patch] sysutils/heartbeat: correct dealing with cases, where are two or more (virtual) interfaces with an IP-address, but only one is up
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:07:43 +0400

 michael.leun01@vodafone.com writes:
 > "Boris B. Samorodov" <bsam@ns.kfs.ru> schrieb am 18.08.2009 13:08:43:
 >
 >> The port sysutils/heartbeat has been updated to version 2.1.4 for two
 >> weeks now. Does this problem still exist and is the patch correct?
 >
 > Yup, the patch is for 2.1.4 / was updated a few days ago.
 
 To maintainer of the FreeBSD port sysutils/heartbeat. Please be
 informed that there is a PR for the port:
 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/137865
 
 Do you approve/deny the patch?
 
 -- 
 WBR, bsam



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200908190910.n7J9A4Kr099504>