Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 3 Feb 2014 22:22:56 -0700
From:      Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com>
Cc:        freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>, Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely7.cicely.de>, ticso@cicely.de, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: wandboard / imx6 / exynos4 / cortex-a9 "wrong-endian bug" fixed
Message-ID:  <EB78E449-E8C2-4D6F-B598-8BE6A5B6427D@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <2BDF104B-16DE-4488-9870-148843D8CC2F@kientzle.com>
References:  <1391371204.13026.43.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <20140202230450.GA42331@cicely7.cicely.de> <CAB3ij4AjkrMfF2YLrjTE5vZx25XT%2B2iTSghKG=kh8iu==XeZ2w@mail.gmail.com> <1391395062.13026.69.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <1584FD9C-581F-4BCF-8153-E381693887DB@bsdimp.com> <2BDF104B-16DE-4488-9870-148843D8CC2F@kientzle.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Feb 3, 2014, at 9:59 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote:

>=20
> On Feb 2, 2014, at 6:59 PM, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
>=20
>>=20
>> On Feb 2, 2014, at 7:37 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
>>=20
>>> On Sun, 2014-02-02 at 18:25 -0700, Tom Everett wrote:
>>>> I can confirm that a crochet image for Wandboard no longer crashes =
after
>>>> this fix.  It doesn't mount the FS yet, but that's a known issue, =
noted
>>>> here:
>>>>=20
>>>> https://github.com/kientzle/crochet-freebsd/issues/29
>>>=20
>>> That thread mentions needing to build a u-boot for wandboard.  =
Here's a
>>> patchset for doing that.  Apply this in your ports/sysutils dir, =
using:
>>>=20
>>> patch -p0 <u-boot-wandboard.diff
>>>=20
>>> This was copied from Tim's beaglebone work and changed a bit for
>>> wandboard. =20
>>>=20
>>> I've been meaning to ask about how we should handle this.  Do we =
want a
>>> u-boot port for every board, or is there some way to parameterize a
>>> single port so that it applies the right set of patches, or what?  =
I'm
>>> not very savvy about ports.
>>=20
>> Usually there's a master port, and slave ports that parameterize. =
When we talked about this at BSDcan, I believe that was the model that =
was suggested for this problem..
>=20
> Does that work when there=92s a different source distro for
> many of the ports?  (Not to mention different patches for
> each one.)

Yes, but there may be complications...

> P.S.  I started a U-Boot port for BeagleBone but my
> time has evaporated.  If anyone wants to take that
> over and extend it for other boards, step right up=85

ENOTIME...

Warner=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?EB78E449-E8C2-4D6F-B598-8BE6A5B6427D>