Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 20:37:07 -0800 From: "Michael W. Belz" <mbelz@sky-river.com> To: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <allbery@ece.cmu.edu>, frzburn <frzburn@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsnap and cvsup for rebuilding world - Which one? Message-ID: <1172983033.60D83A1@fb8.dngr.org> In-Reply-To: <7358E9CA-7FAA-461D-B0F0-16A3DEBEA59C@ece.cmu.edu> References: <2942dae0703031923q2887c59dh85f103bff424e7b7@mail.gmail.com> <7358E9CA-7FAA-461D-B0F0-16A3DEBEA59C@ece.cmu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Stick with what has been posted, documented and tried and tested more importantly your having issues finding solid docs to support your task...using cvsup you have handbook docs and freebsd diary to use don't reinvent the wheel On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 8:30 pm, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote: > > On Mar 3, 2007, at 22:23 , frzburn wrote: > >> So here come my questions: >> Is portsnap syncing the sources correctly for rebuilding world, or >> must I >> use cvsup? >> If so, of what use is portsnap if I must use cvsup for synchronizing >> my >> source? > > It's a little out of date; instead of cvsup, you use csup which is in > the base system (and only supports updating the base system, hence > portsnap). > > -- > brandon s. allbery [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] > allbery@kf8nh.com > system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] > allbery@ece.cmu.edu > electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university > KF8NH > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Michael Belz System Administrator Sky River Management 702.336.9418 Sent from Sidekick 2
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1172983033.60D83A1>