Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 11:09:49 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: brandelf and LINUXBASE/usr/libexec Message-ID: <20111212090949.GJ50300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <4EE4F282.2040000@passap.ru> References: <4EE4F282.2040000@passap.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--GMCnT9MSm990nw/y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:12:18PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > Hi List, >=20 > linux ports install some linux ELF binaries at LINUXBASE/usr/libexec. > Should those files be branded to linux? I do not think any files should branded (in the sense of brandelf(1)) for any supported FreeBSD release and Linux binary built with relatively modern Linux toolchain. --GMCnT9MSm990nw/y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk7lxN0ACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4gR3wCeIUElc+pZx01cQjUqO4q2TRA8 AnIAn3p8MLJOsjBVicOEOrZ9teO5mdOt =Ux5y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GMCnT9MSm990nw/y--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111212090949.GJ50300>