Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:01:20 +0100 From: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= <bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de> Cc: Garrett Cooper <youshi10@u.washington.edu>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any idea when Xorg 7.0's coming to FBSD? Message-ID: <20060203080120.GB976@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <43E30BDD.9090005@cs.tu-berlin.de> References: <43E2E2F1.70206@u.washington.edu> <20060203050813.GA45810@xor.obsecurity.org> <43E2F43B.1000303@u.washington.edu> <43E30BDD.9090005@cs.tu-berlin.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 08:53:01AM +0100, Bj=F6rn K=F6nig wrote: > Garrett Cooper schrieb: > > Erm, unless 6.9 is modular (which I didn't think was the case), there= =20 > > should be a noticeable difference. >=20 > The noticeable difference is that 7.0 takes much more time to compile=20 > all in all because of its modularity. A German magazine tested both: 6.9= =20 > took 19 minutes and 7.0 75 minutes on their dual Opteron 246 machine=20 > with 2 GB RAM (source: iX 1/2006). Heh :-) But the advantage *should* be that you don't need to recompile all of that every major upgrade. I don't know what will become of that ideal though, only time will tell I guess. --Stijn --=20 MY HATE OF D02 KNOW NO LIMIT -- A Silent Wail, http://forum.rpg.net/showthread.php?s=3D&threadid=3D31914 --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD4w3QY3r/tLQmfWcRAkWRAJ94RHbDUQ+px3DS1O6Z/di9oR0zWgCglx09 +pl+wox5dAIpAh9OTv/aGSY= =pGMw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060203080120.GB976>