Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 10:30:41 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> To: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re: `Hiding' libc symbols Message-ID: <20030506153040.GH77708@madman.celabo.org> In-Reply-To: <20030506092519.GA3158@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> References: <20030501182820.GA53641@madman.celabo.org> <XFMail.20030501144502.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20030505110601.H53365@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20030505175426.GA19352@madman.celabo.org> <20030506093754.B838@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20030506092519.GA3158@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 07:25:20PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > >The situation may be different for non-standardized functions with names > >in the application space like err(). > > Last time I checked, the base system included a program that included its > own err() function - with functionality substantially different to err(3). Yep, these symbols (err, warn) are already hidden using namespace.h. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine . NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal nectar@celabo.org . jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@freebsd.org . nectar@kth.se
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030506153040.GH77708>