Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 14:45:31 -0400 From: Gary Schrock <root@eyelab.psy.msu.edu> To: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NT4 server 2.5 times faster than Linux Message-ID: <4.2.0.32.19990415144237.00a84aa0@eyelab.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <199904151828.LAA85761@rah.star-gate.com> References: <Your message of "Thu, 15 Apr 1999 13:50:55 EDT." <4.2.0.32.19990415134842.00a34700@eyelab.msu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 11:28 AM 4/15/99 -0700, Amancio Hasty wrote: >That article mentioned that getting the linux tuning parameters was scattered >all >over the place and it also mentioned that getting hold of a technical person >was difficult . Well, I'd have to argue that those points probably are somewhat valid (although I don't think it takes *too* much searching to at least come up with some optimizations for linux). However, it did clearly point out the fact that the tests were run with a highly tuned nt server and a linux kernel that wasn't really tuned at all. It also pointed out that on a platform that's on the lower end of the spectrum that linux will consistently outperform nt. Gary Schrock root@eyelab.msu.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.2.0.32.19990415144237.00a84aa0>