Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 2 Apr 2013 15:43:25 -0700
From:      Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To:        Eric van Gyzen <eric@vangyzen.net>
Cc:        stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [patch] IPMI KCS can drop the lock while servicing a request
Message-ID:  <CAJ-Vmokopw=PRC-v8H4hb8La2jZG-vLRWEhdhzem9r9oqj-sww@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <514E6ED8.9040305@vangyzen.net>
References:  <514E6ED8.9040305@vangyzen.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 23 March 2013 20:11, Eric van Gyzen <eric@vangyzen.net> wrote:
> At work, we discovered that our application's IPMI thread would often use a
> lot of CPU time.  The KCS thread uses DELAY to wait for the BMC, so it can
> run without sleeping for a "long" time with a slow BMC.  It also holds the
> ipmi_softc.ipmi_lock during this time.  When using adaptive mutexes, an
> application thread that wants to operate on the ipmi_pending_requests list
> will also spin during this same time.
>
> We see no reason that the KCS thread needs to hold the lock while servicing
> a request.  We've been running with the attached patch for a few months,
> with no ill effects.

Typically holding a lock is to serialise both program state and hardware state.

The whole "unlock; do blocking work or sleep; lock" thing needs to be
very carefully thought out.



Adrian



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmokopw=PRC-v8H4hb8La2jZG-vLRWEhdhzem9r9oqj-sww>